| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
| 3. |  | GUIMARÃES, M. R. S.; PRADO, R. B.; FIDALGO, E. C. C.; MONTEIRO, J. M. G.; SANSEVERO, J. B. B. Perspectivas para estimativa de biomassa viva e estoque de carbono acima do solo em áreas verdes urbanas do domínio Mata Atlântica, Brasil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Arborização Urbana, v. 17, n. 4, p. 41-59, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
|    |
| 4. | | SANSEVERO, J. B. B.; PRIETO, P. V.; MORAES, L. F. D. DE; RODRIGUES, P. J. F. P. Natural regeneration in plantations of native trees in lowland Brazilian Atlantic Forest: community structure, diversity, and dispersal syndromes. Restoration Ecology, v. 19, n. 3, p. 379-389, 2011.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|  |
| 7. | | OLIVEIRA, A. L. de; COELHO JÚNIOR, M. G.; BARROS, D. A.; RESENDE, A. S. de; SANSEVERO, J. B. B.; BORGES, L. A. C.; BASSO, V. M.; FARIA, S. M. de. Revisiting the concept of fiscal modules: implications for restoration andconservation programs in Brazil. Land Use Policy, v. 99, e104978, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| 8. | | COELHO JUNIOR, M. G.; BIJU, B. P.; SILVA NETO, E. C. da; OLIVEIRA, A. L. de; TAVARES, A. A. de O.; BASSO, V. M.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; CARVALHO, A. G. de; SANSEVERO, J. B. B. Improving the management effectiveness and decision-making by stakeholders' perspectives: a case study in a protected area from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 272, 111083, Oct. 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 9. | | LEMGRUBER, L. S.; SANSEVERO, J. B. B.; PINTO, H. A.; CASTRO, A.; LATAWIEC, A. E.; STRASSBURG, B.; BRANCALION, P.; RODRIGUES, R. R.; PINTO, S. R.; MORAES, L. F. D. de. Mucho más allá de la foresta: los impactos socio-económicos de los proyectos de restauración ecológica en la Mata Atlántica de Brasil. In: CECCON, E.; PÉREZ, D. R. (Coord.) Más allá de la ecología de la restauración: perspectivas sociales en América Latina y el Caribe. Buenos Aires: Vázquez Mazzini Editores, 2016.384 p. p. 117-134| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Solos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnps.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/07/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/10/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
COELHO JUNIOR, M. G.; BIJU, B. P.; SILVA NETO, E. C. da; OLIVEIRA, A. L. de; TAVARES, A. A. de O.; BASSO, V. M.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; CARVALHO, A. G. de; SANSEVERO, J. B. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCONDES GERALDO COELHO JUNIOR, UFRRJ; BARBARA PAVANI BIJU, UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO; EDUARDO CARVALHO DA SILVA NETO, UFRRJ; ATHILA LEANDRO DE OLIVEIRA, UFRRJ; ANA ALICE DE OLIVEIRA TAVARES, UFRRJ; VANESSA MARIA BASSO, UFRRJ; ANA PAULA DIAS TURETTA, CNPS; ACACIO GERALDO DE CARVALHO, UFRRJ; JERONIMO BOELSUMS BARRETO SANSEVERO, UFRRJ. |
|
Título: |
Improving the management effectiveness and decision-making by stakeholders' perspectives: a case study in a protected area from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Environmental Management, v. 272, 111083, Oct. 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111083 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Assessing management effectiveness in protected areas is a fundamental instrument to achieve socio-biodiversity protection goals. This study aimed to analyze the management effectiveness of Cunhambebe State Park (from now on, "PEC") in the State of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, from the perception of stakeholders and the multi-temporal analysis of land use and land cover between 1998 and 2018. We used the Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management method for a participatory approach. Seventy-two indicators were used and applied to assess the perception of stakeholders related to the Advisory Council. The management effectiveness of PEC was classified as moderately satisfactory (63.41%). Indicators of "Legal security", "Vulnerability", "Site design and planning" and "Financial resources" revealed the weaknesses and threats of management and what should be the priority projects for better effectiveness. Through the multi-temporal analysis, we identified that the advances of pasture and urban areas are the highest pressures and threats, as perceived by stakeholders. In our case study, we provide evidence of actions that must be performed by the PEC management team. These actions must consider the weaknesses and threats presented by the SWOT analysis. Finally, we recommend some political and management measures: 1) Financial resources for the land regularization of areas overlapping with PEC, 2) Guidelines about PEC areas must be included in the Master Plans of municipalities that cover PEC limits, 3) Technical assistance to improve land management, and 4) Strengthen environmental education initiatives at all school levels. MenosAssessing management effectiveness in protected areas is a fundamental instrument to achieve socio-biodiversity protection goals. This study aimed to analyze the management effectiveness of Cunhambebe State Park (from now on, "PEC") in the State of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, from the perception of stakeholders and the multi-temporal analysis of land use and land cover between 1998 and 2018. We used the Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management method for a participatory approach. Seventy-two indicators were used and applied to assess the perception of stakeholders related to the Advisory Council. The management effectiveness of PEC was classified as moderately satisfactory (63.41%). Indicators of "Legal security", "Vulnerability", "Site design and planning" and "Financial resources" revealed the weaknesses and threats of management and what should be the priority projects for better effectiveness. Through the multi-temporal analysis, we identified that the advances of pasture and urban areas are the highest pressures and threats, as perceived by stakeholders. In our case study, we provide evidence of actions that must be performed by the PEC management team. These actions must consider the weaknesses and threats presented by the SWOT analysis. Finally, we recommend some political and management measures: 1) Financial resources for the land regularization of areas overlapping with PEC, 2) Guidelines about PEC areas must be included in the Master Plans of... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Gerenciamento de áreas protegidas; Mata Atlântica; Planejamento de conservação; RAPPAM; Uso e cobertura do solo. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02670naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2123910
005 2020-10-06
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111083$2DOI
100 1 $aCOELHO JUNIOR, M. G.
245 $aImproving the management effectiveness and decision-making by stakeholders' perspectives$ba case study in a protected area from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aAssessing management effectiveness in protected areas is a fundamental instrument to achieve socio-biodiversity protection goals. This study aimed to analyze the management effectiveness of Cunhambebe State Park (from now on, "PEC") in the State of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, from the perception of stakeholders and the multi-temporal analysis of land use and land cover between 1998 and 2018. We used the Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management method for a participatory approach. Seventy-two indicators were used and applied to assess the perception of stakeholders related to the Advisory Council. The management effectiveness of PEC was classified as moderately satisfactory (63.41%). Indicators of "Legal security", "Vulnerability", "Site design and planning" and "Financial resources" revealed the weaknesses and threats of management and what should be the priority projects for better effectiveness. Through the multi-temporal analysis, we identified that the advances of pasture and urban areas are the highest pressures and threats, as perceived by stakeholders. In our case study, we provide evidence of actions that must be performed by the PEC management team. These actions must consider the weaknesses and threats presented by the SWOT analysis. Finally, we recommend some political and management measures: 1) Financial resources for the land regularization of areas overlapping with PEC, 2) Guidelines about PEC areas must be included in the Master Plans of municipalities that cover PEC limits, 3) Technical assistance to improve land management, and 4) Strengthen environmental education initiatives at all school levels.
653 $aGerenciamento de áreas protegidas
653 $aMata Atlântica
653 $aPlanejamento de conservação
653 $aRAPPAM
653 $aUso e cobertura do solo
700 1 $aBIJU, B. P.
700 1 $aSILVA NETO, E. C. da
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. L. de
700 1 $aTAVARES, A. A. de O.
700 1 $aBASSO, V. M.
700 1 $aTURETTA, A. P. D.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, A. G. de
700 1 $aSANSEVERO, J. B. B.
773 $tJournal of Environmental Management$gv. 272, 111083, Oct. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
